Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.cihe.edu.hk/jspui/handle/cihe/686
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChan, Eric Lu Sheken_US
dc.contributor.otherKam, J. K. M.-
dc.contributor.otherLee, A.-
dc.contributor.otherWei, V. W.-
dc.contributor.otherKwok, K. O.-
dc.contributor.otherLui, D.-
dc.contributor.otherYuen, R. K. N.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-09T10:06:42Z-
dc.date.available2021-06-09T10:06:42Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.cihe.edu.hk/jspui/handle/cihe/686-
dc.description.abstractBackground Fifteen years have passed since the outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome in Hong Kong. At that time, there were reports of heroic acts among professionals who cared for these patients, whose bravery and professionalism were highly praised. However, there are concerns about changes in new generation of nursing professionals. Objective We aimed to examine the attitude of nursing students, should they be faced with severe acute respiratory syndrome patients during their future work. Research design A questionnaire survey was carried out to examine the attitude among final-year nursing students to three ethical areas, namely, duty of care, resource allocation, and collateral damage. Ethical considerations This study was carried out in accordance with the requirements and recommendations of the Central Research and Ethics Committee, School of Health Sciences at Caritas Institute of Higher Education. Findings Complete responses from 102 subjects were analyzed. The overwhelming majority (96.1%) did not agree to participate in the intubation of severe acute respiratory syndrome patients if protective measures, that is, N95 mask and gown, were not available. If there were insufficient N95 masks for all the medical, nursing, and allied health workers in the hospital (resource allocation), 37.3% felt that the distribution of N95 masks should be by casting lot, while the rest disagreed. When asked about collateral damage, more than three-quarters (77.5%) said that severe acute respiratory syndrome patients should be admitted to intensive care unit. There was sex difference in nursing students’ attitude toward severe acute respiratory syndrome care during pregnancy and influence of age in understanding intensive care unit care for these patients. Interestingly, 94.1% felt that there should be a separate intensive care unit for severe acute respiratory syndrome patients. Conclusion As infection control practice and isolation facilities improved over the years, relevant knowledge and nursing ethical issues related to infectious diseases should become part of nursing education and training programs, especially in preparation for outbreaks of infectious diseases or distress.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofNursing Ethicsen_US
dc.titleStudent nurses' ethical views on responses to the severe acute respiratory syndrome outbreaken_US
dc.typejournal articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0969733019895804-
dc.contributor.affiliationSchool of Health Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.issn1477-0989en_US
dc.description.volume27en_US
dc.description.issue4en_US
dc.description.startpage924en_US
dc.description.endpage935en_US
dc.cihe.affiliatedYes-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.openairetypejournal article-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptSchool of Health Sciences-
Appears in Collections:HS Publication
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
View Online127 BHTMLView/Open
SFX Query Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.