Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.cihe.edu.hk/jspui/handle/cihe/3631
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLo, Tit Wingen_US
dc.contributor.otherLam, C. Y.-
dc.contributor.otherLi, K.-K.-
dc.contributor.otherChung, K. H. E.-
dc.contributor.otherYeung, D. Y.-
dc.contributor.otherChiu, M. Y. L.-
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-31T07:16:06Z-
dc.date.available2023-01-31T07:16:06Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.cihe.edu.hk/jspui/handle/cihe/3631-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Caregivers of older adults are essential in fostering aging-in-place. Caregiving can be challenging and uncertain. While most supporting efforts are used to satisfy the needs of caregivers, their strengths are often overlooked in the individualized support planning. This study aimed to develop the Caregiver Needs and Resources Assessment (CNRA), which can aid social workers incase management of caregivers. Methods: Items were generated and selected based on theories, existing measures, and practitioner consultations. A total of 351 caregivers of older adults recruited through 4non-government organizations in Hong Kong completed a survey that included the initial items in CNRA, measures of related constructs, and some measures of well-being outcomes (e.g., quality of life, burden, personal gain, positive aspects of caregiving). Results: Items on needs and resources were analyzed separately, considering the differences in their nature and utilization in care management. Using exploratory factor analyses, five factors on needs (physiological needs, role conflict, care recipient’s needs, psychological needs, and social needs; 15 items) and seven factors on resources (spirituality, self-efficacy, responsibility, community supports, family supports, closeness with the care recipient, and health awareness; 21 items) were extracted. The model fit indexes in the confirmatory factor analyses were also satisfactory. The evidence for convergent validity were demonstrated by the moderate-to-high correlations between the factors in CNRA and the related constructs/outcomes. Discussion: Supporting evidence was found on the validity of CNRA. The factors on needs covered most areas of other existing measures. Personal agency (e.g., self-efficacy) and social agency (e.g., family supports) are two major groups of resources. Further studies are needed to examine the usefulness of CNRA in case management by social workers.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.titleCaregiver needs and resources assessment: Development and validationen_US
dc.typeconference paperen_US
dc.relation.conferenceThe 32nd International Congress of Psychologyen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationFelizberta Lo Padilla Tong School of Social Sciencesen_US
dc.cihe.affiliatedNo-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairetypeconference paper-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.deptFelizberta Lo Padilla Tong School of Social Sciences-
Appears in Collections:SS Publication
SFX Query Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.