Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.cihe.edu.hk/jspui/handle/cihe/282
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYip, Cynthia Sau Chun-
dc.contributor.otherLam, W.-
dc.contributor.otherFielding, R.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-19T03:33:17Z-
dc.date.available2021-03-19T03:33:17Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.cihe.edu.hk/jspui/handle/cihe/282-
dc.description.abstractThis review summarizes published meta-analysis outcomes on the associations between meat intakes and burden of diseases. A novel assessment process was developed, combining selected Cochrane Review measures, AMSTAR checklist, and other quality measures identified by authors during preliminary phases of the review process. Meat intakes have been found to be statistically significant associated with 21 burden of diseases. A total of 37 risk-outcome best dose–response estimations were identified, all were positively associated, and 21 of them with low to moderate, or insignificant heterogeneity. The highest dose–responses per 50 g increases in processed meat intake at 95% confident levels were 1.81 (1.32, 2.48) for esophageal cancer, 1.71 (1.34, 2.19) for stomach cancer, 1.42 (1.07, 1.89) for CHD, 1.32 (1.19, 1.48) for diabetes, and 1.24 (1.13, 1.35) for colon cancer incidences, and 1.24 (1.09, 1.40) for CVD mortality. The highest dose–responses per each 65 g increases in total red meat intake were 1.36 (1.16, 1.58) for endometrial cancer, 1.25 (1.10, 1.41) esophageal cancer, and 1.22 (1.16, 1.23) for lung cancer incidences. In addition, 14 statistically significant associations in terms of high vs low meat intake relative risks were also identified. Total red meat intakes were found negatively associated with CVD and cancer mortalities, and poultry meat intakes were found negatively associated with all-cause and cancer mortalities, and rectal cancer incidences in low meat consumption Asian countries. Current global and dietary Comparative Risk Assessments may underestimate burden of diseases attributed to meat intakes. More investigation is needed in low-meat consumption countries.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Clinical Nutritionen_US
dc.titleA summary of meat intakes and health burdensen_US
dc.typejournal articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/ejcn.2017.117-
dc.contributor.affiliationSchool of Health Sciences-
dc.relation.issn1476-5640en_US
dc.description.volume72en_US
dc.description.issue1en_US
dc.description.startpage18en_US
dc.description.endpage29en_US
dc.cihe.affiliatedNo-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.openairetypejournal article-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptSchool of Health Sciences-
Appears in Collections:HS Publication
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
View Online166 BHTMLView/Open
SFX Query Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.