Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.cihe.edu.hk/jspui/handle/cihe/2563
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLeung, Andrew Yee Taken_US
dc.contributor.otherLam, H. F.-
dc.contributor.otherNg, C. T.-
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-14T07:48:01Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-14T07:48:01Z-
dc.date.issued2008-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.cihe.edu.hk/jspui/handle/cihe/2563-
dc.description.abstractThe problem of crack detection has been studied by many researchers, and many methods of approaching the problem have been developed. To quantify the crack extent, most methods follow the model updating approach. This approach treats the crack location and extent as model parameters, which are then identified by minimizing the discrepancy between the modeled and the measured dynamic responses. Most methods following this approach focus on the detection of a single crack or multicracks in situations in which the number of cracks is known. The main objective of this paper is to address the crack detection problem in a general situation in which the number of cracks is not known in advance. The crack detection methodology proposed in this paper consists of two phases. In the first phase, different classes of models are employed to model the beam with different numbers of cracks, and the Bayesian model class selection method is then employed to identify the most plausible class of models based on the set of measured dynamic data in order to identify the number of cracks on the beam. In the second phase, the posterior (updated) probability density function of the crack locations and the corresponding extents is calculated using the Bayesian statistical framework. As a result, the uncertainties that may have been introduced by measurement noise and modeling error can be explicitly dealt with. The methodology proposed herein has been verified by and demonstrated through a comprehensive series of numerical case studies, in which noisy data were generated by a Bernoulli–Euler beam with semirigid connections. The results of these studies show that the proposed methodology can correctly identify the number of cracks even when the crack extent is small. The effects of measurement noise, modeling error, and the complexity of the class of identification model on the crack detection results have also been studied and are discussed in this paper.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineersen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Engineering Mechanicsen_US
dc.titleMulticrack detection on semirigidly connected beams utilizing dynamic dataen_US
dc.typejournal articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2008)134:1(90)-
dc.contributor.affiliationSchool of Computing and Information Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.issn0733-9399en_US
dc.description.volume134en_US
dc.description.issue1en_US
dc.description.startpage90en_US
dc.description.endpage99en_US
dc.cihe.affiliatedNo-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairetypejournal article-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.deptYam Pak Charitable Foundation School of Computing and Information Sciences-
Appears in Collections:CIS Publication
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
View Online222 BHTMLView/Open
SFX Query Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.